This is so absurd and awful I can’t think of anything to say right now.
This is so absurd and awful I can’t think of anything to say right now.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/28/us/28cnd-scotus.html?hp
This entry was posted on Thursday, June 28th, 2007 at 5:10 pm and is filed under democracy, politics, racism, social justice. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Native of Kentucky and Ohio. Student of Christianity, religion, democracy, sexuality, suffering/healing, and gender. Lover of animals, my cats, books, my sweet babies, my family, and cozy, warm homes. Interested in how to make the world a more just and loving place, and in trying to be less serious and more fun. I am both amazed and intrigued by the ways that we journey through this life and make sense of it all and envision this (now occasional) blog as place to reflect on all of the above.
If those five justices could repeal the fifteenth and nineteenth amendments, no doubt they would.
No kidding. It is so awful and upsetting and I feel so helpless. Ugg.
This type of article really fuels my hope for a radical, grassroots rejection of public schools, and a turning towards cooperative schools or other alternatives.
Hmm. I would love cooperative schools or other alternatives too, but I’m afraid that really what this ruling means is that more black and hispanic kids will go to school with mostly other black and hispanic kids at underfunded schools. Not that that doesn’t already happen on a painfully massive scale, but Louisville and Seattle had two really good integration programs that tried to reduce that. WTF is desegregation if the Supreme Court “limits the use of race in integration plans” as the lovely NYTs points out here http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/us/29scotus.html?em&ex=1183262400&en=796a88cf4425bafa&ei=5070. Desegregation without race. Lovely. Perfect conservative postmodernism.
Again, I’m all for better schools, perhaps cooperative or other alternatives, but I can’t imagine how this ruling will somehow contribute to that… I wish it would but…… sigh.
Hi
Nice Site