I know that since the war in Iraq costs about $1.1 billion every day, I should not be fretting about the relatively low cost of bringing dancers to entertain marines, but I still really don’t like it. I read about it in this article in The New York Times. I am all for doing things to keep the troops entertained and morale up. I’m not even against sexy female dancers in general, although I can’t say I love the idea either. But I am against the government paying for sexy female dancers to go to Iraq to entertain the troops and “keep morale up.” As if the military doesn’t already have enough problems with women being seen as equal, treated fairly, etc. If you read the article in the times alongside the case of Suzanne Swift eventually went AWOL from the military after being sexually harassed and treated just horrible clearly because she was a woman, then the whole having dancers flown in for the Marines seems even more problematic. Of course, it is a small blip on the screen of horrors related to Iraq and I don’t mean to minimize all the other much more tragic things that have happened. But still. I don’t like it one bit.
As I may have mentioned before, and certainly for those who know me, I am not a laugher. I am not against it of course, it just takes a lot to make me really laugh. Like spontaneously. But the article God and Guitars at Killing the Buddha just cracked me up. The author is writing about a Christian rock concert he was at as a 15 year old…
Beside us, a middle-aged man wearing a moustache, a leather jacket, and a green mohawk shouted, “Rock for the Flock!” He raised his fist. “Jam for the Lamb!
Whoever picks the Christian articles for ktb HAS to have been involved in evangelical Christianity at one point or another. They just hit it right on the nose so often (one of my other favorite articles ever is Jesus and I Broke Up). So, now go read God and Guitars at Killing the Buddha.
I know some folks who read this are interested in holistic health and healing. I stumbled across http://well-soul.blogspot.com/ a few days ago and it seems like a really neat place to check out. It is written by a UU woman who struggled with chronic pain for years. She writes that
My healing came through some complementary medicine and a realization that I had to take the lead in healing myself. The doctors were never going to do it for me.
Her other blog is http://uusoul.blogspot.com/.
I just read this article in the New York Times which is just soooo not what someone who has been sick on and off for years wants to read. It is an article about somatization syndrome. I’ve never heard of it before now, but it seems to be a situation where someone has aches, pains, fatigue, dizziness, or other various symptoms for which doctors cannot find a medical explanation. So you know what? Then it becomes a psychiatric disorder. I googled this and there apparently are actually people who really do have this. That is, physical problems are caused very directly by psychiatric issues and the people need psychotherapy. All well and good. But for those of us who do not have a psychiatric disorder and something actually is causing our fatigue, stomach aches, head aches, decreased immune system functioning, or whatever symptoms there are, this gives doctors such an easy way to say it is all in the head and just get some therapy. Can’t figure it out? Just chalk it up to somatization syndrome.
This reminds me of my most recent doctor who suggested I meditate as a response to my health concerns. Maybe she secretly thought I had this. Ugg. Luckily, the first site that comes up when you google this is a site that helps reassure those with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Fibromalgia (two very difficult to diagnose disorders that often interfere quite a bit with one’s every day life) that a doctor who is familiar with the various disorders will know how to differentiate between them. Of course, the problem is that many many doctors don’t know how to recognize or treat either CFS or Fibromalgia, along with 100s of other rare or complex problems that people live with for years because they are not correctly identified. Sigh. Sigh sigh.
While I’m certainly glad that people with somatization syndrome are able to be well-diagnosed and get treatment, I just hate to think about all the people who actually do have a non-psychiatric medical issue that are put in the “somatization syndrome” box. It is just so frustrating and sad that so many people suffer for years with medical issues that doctors cannot adequately recognize or treat because medical training and practice is so scientistic and regimented – so unholistic and so inattentive to the complexity of medical problems that don’t fit into any of the pre-established boxes.
George Lakoff became sort of a progressive/liberal rock star with his idea of framing which I found helpful. But his new book Whose Freedom? raises conundrums like this one pointed out by Robert Jensen in The Limits of Lakoff’s Politics: Outside the Frame:
Lakoff’s “frame,” simply stated is:
(1) Right-wing Republicans are the cause of our problems, and
(2) progressives working through the Democratic Party will deliver the solutions.
So, out the window must go any facts or analyses that suggest
(1) the problems of an unjust and unsustainable world may be rooted in fundamental systems, such as corporate capitalism and the imperialism of powerful nation-states, no matter who is in power, and
(2) the Democratic Party is not only not a meaningful vehicle for progressive politics but, as a subsidiary of that corporate system with its own history and contemporary practice of empire-building, is part of the problem.
Geesh, I wish solutions/approaches to some sort of solution were easier. Do we try to dismantle the whole system of oppression that is just HUGE and rich and mean and ruthless, or do we make do and try to reduce the amount of harm done by such a system? I always shake my head at revolutionary types that (it seems naively) think we can sort of undo capitalism-as-we-know-it. Yet, it also feels sort of like selling out if we resign ourselves to just try to mitigate the harm done by the system, which is really all that can be done if the capitalism-U.S.-military-corporation-materialism-WTO-IMF complex remains intact. And I know that we could try to do both, but there are limited resources for what we do and so if we split them between making-do and dismantling-the-system, we may make little progress on either. What would “revolution” even look like, I wonder? I will try to look into that and see. In the meantime, over at the progressive strategy blog, they are thinking about this is much more sophisticated ways. Read a more in-depth discussion of things over there.
Lots of great church talk out there… and two posts in two days saying that liberal religious traditions might want to take a look at what conservative religious traditions are doing. Not in the sense of indoctrination (of course) but in terms of how megachurches and evangelical and fundamentalist Christian communities in general are growing because (I think) they are meeting people’s needs in some ways. Some of these ways religious liberals will never be able to match (we just can’t give you absolute, for certain answers about the nature of the universe), but some things we might be able to do. But that is another post. Or a past post, really.
The first “church talk” going on out there was over at The Journey on testimonies from yesterday, and today the post on megachurches over at LoFi Tribe where Shawn Anthony offers a few notes re: mega Churches and the philosophy of ministry so characteristic of them. He points out the the only reason for their success is not because it leads believers (attenders) to have an emotional experience. Agreed, this is not the only reason and it is perhaps an overemphasized reason – things are both more complex and more strategic than “just” emotion. But it is a pretty significant factor, in my opinion. Head over his blog to read more about megachurches. Based on my years in high school at a megachurch, he is pretty on target.
I’ve been wondering what I can do for the midterm elections and I’ve found it. I’m originally from Ohio and there is a competitive race in Cincinnati between Republican incumbent Steve Chabot and the Democratic challenger John Cranley (www.johncranley.com). I’m going to be guest blogging on Cranley’s campaign blog Take Back Cincinnati www.takebackcincinnati.com and helping to do online campaigning where I can. I think Cranley is not just an acceptable alternative to a very unappealing Republican, but he is actually a really exciting candidate. For once, it isn’t the lesser of two evils, but there is actually a good choice.
Cranley lives in the Price Hill neighborhood of Cincinnati, which has traditionally been the neighborhood where Appalachian folks have migrated to in order to get jobs in the city. I love it that he lives IN the city with the folks. Cranley is also a graduate of Harvard Divinity School where I am currently studying and a place that I truly think does an excellent job of preparing people to think and reflect ethically. (He also graduated from Harvard Law School.) I really feel like he will do an excellent job as a member of the House of Representatives, giving the folks of Cincinnati the representation that they deserve. Of course, it is easy to do a much better job than Chabot who has, just to name a few things, continually advocated for a cut in estate taxes, has “serious reservations” about raising the minimum wage, has failed to criticize the Bush administration’s policies related to national security, voted to on allow school prayer during the so-called War on Terror (Nov 2001), and voted to make it a federal crime to transport minor girls across state lines in order to get an abortion. I could go on, but you get the picture.
Want to help get John Cranley elected? You can do your little part by writing a little blurb on your blog about him and linking to www.takebackcincinnati.com. Do your part for Ohioans who deserve just, ethical representation in the House of Representatives.
Over at the blog The Journey Lizard Eater writes about how UUs might want to think more about developing a testimony rather than using our so-called elevator speeches. I won’t repeat her whole post and just say it is good and I think you should read it. And it just reinfornces what I’ve been saying for a while that we need to pay more attention to the way conservative Christianity is winning the hearts and minds of this country (and souls, if you will) by appealing to feelings and emotions. Reason just ain’t gonna do it, folks.
This bibliography has a Christian slant. I am unfamiliar with scholarship on queer theology in other traditions, although I am quite sure it is available to some degree. Also, some of these books do not have a religious slant but are relevant to understanding or developing queer theology. And you will notice that this is only partially annotated. It is a work in progress and obviously not comprehensive. There are probably still some typos, which I will eventually get to. Please feel free to offer feedback.
Queer Theology Bibliography
*Do not reproduce bibliography in full, or reproduce annotations at all, without acknowledgment. Permission to reproduce with acknowledgment granted.
Alexander, Marilyn Bennett and Preston, James. We Were Baptized Too: Claiming God’s Grace for Lesbians and Gays, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1996.
A book that encourages churches to take baptism and communion seriously as tools to promote justice, grace and liberation, particularly in regards to queer identified people.
Althaus-Reid, Marcella María. Indecent Theology: Theological Perversions in Sex, Gender and Politics, London, UK: Routledge, 2000.
Althaus-Reid, Marcella María.The Queer God, London, UK: Routledge, 2003.
Balch, David L., ed.Homosexuality, Science and the “Plain Sense” of Scripture, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000.
A collection of essays that seeks to offer a balanced discussion of “the interpretation of the Bible in relation to the morality of homosexual acts and relationships.”Deals primarily with Hebrew Bible texts and Romans. The focal point is that of the Christian church.The contributors span many denominations.
Bird, Phyllis A. “The Bible in Christian Ethical Deliberation: Old Testament Contributions,” in Balch, David L., ed., Homosexuality, Sciences, and the “Plain Sense” of Scripture, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000: 142-176.
A systematic analysis of those verses in the Hebrew Bible that have traditionally been understood to say something about male/male and/or female/female sexual intimacy. She also includes “Conclusions and Implications for Contemporary Use,” and draws the conclusion that the texts have little relevance to mutually agreeable sexual intimacy between two men (and, implicitly, two women) in the
Boswell, John. Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
This is one of the most cited and discussed books on the subject. Although it was written in 1980 and some of Boswell’s claims and interpretations have been shown to be inaccurate, it is still an amazingly helpful resource on the subject. As with many works on this topic, the tone is somewhat self-assured, even on subjects which are far from as clear as Boswell makes them seem. The four parts of the book (Points of Departure, The Christian Tradition, Shifting Fortunes and The Rise of Intolerance) cover a wide range of time periods and sources, including but not limited to Rome, Christian Scripture, Theological Traditions, the Middle Ages, and the two appendices which deal with Lexicography and Saint Paul (1) and Texts and Translations (2).
Boswell, John. Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe, New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.
Boyarin, Daniel. “Are There Any Jews in the ‘The History of Sexuality’?” Journal of the History of Sexuality, 5, 1995: 333-355.
Brooten, Bernadette J.Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism, Chicago, IL
The most comprehensive work on female/female relationships in early Christianity. Corrects and alters some of Boswell (1980) and Dover’s (1989) pioneering works about male/male and/or female/female sexual intimacy in early Christianity. Provides detailed study of Romans 1:18-22, perhaps the most comprehensive available.
Brooten, Bernadette. “Patristic Interpretations of Romans 1:26,” in Livingtone, Elizabeth, ed. Studia Patristica, volume 18, Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publishing,1985: 287-291.
Bullough, Vern L.“Homosexuality as Submissive Behavior: Example from Mythology,” Journal of Sex Research, 9, 1973: 283-288.
Brooten, Bernadette. “Response to Reviews of Brooten, Love Between Women, by Ken Stone, Natalie Boymel Kampen, David Halperin, Deirdre Good, and Ann Pellegrini,” GLQ 4, 1998: 606-630.
Brooten, Bernadette. “Paul and the Law: How Complete was the Departure?” The Princeton Seminary Bulletin, Supplementary Issue, 1, 1990: 71-89.
Brooten, Bernadette.”Roundtable Discussion: Lesbianism and Feminist Theology,” Response to Carter Heyward and Mary E. Hunt, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 2, 1986: 100f.
Brooten, Bernadette. “Paul’s Views on the Nature of Women and Female Homoeroticism,” in Immaculate and Powerful. Ed. Clarissa Atkinson, Constance Buchanan and Margaret Miles. Boston: Beacon, 1985: 61-87.
Brooten, Bernadette. “Early Christian Women and their Cultural Context: Issues of Method in Historical Reconstruction,” in Feminist Perspectives on Biblical Scholarship. Ed. Adela Yarbro Collins. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985: 66-91.
Brooten, Bernadette.”Women and the Churches in Early Christianity,” Ecumenical Trends 14, 1985: 51-54.
Brooten, Bernadette. “Feminist Perspectives on New Testament Exegesis,” Concilium 138, 1980: 55-61.
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York, NY: Routledge, 1990.
Butler, Judith.Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, New York, NY: Routledge, 1993.
Butler, Judith. Undoing Gender. New York, Routledge, 2004.
Carden, Michael. “Homophobia and Rape in Sodom and Gibeah: A Response to Ken Stone,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 82, March 1999: 85-95.
Critiques Ken Stone’s position that Genesis 19 and Judges 19-21 are references to homosexuality, raising the objection that “homosexuality as interpretive device” for these verses is highly problematic.He goes on to deal with Genesis 19 and Judges 19-21, attempting to detoxify them as queer texts of terror (drawing on Phyllis Trible’s analysis of texts that are “ texts of terror” for women).A particularly interesting and helpful article about the use of “homosexuality” to refer to ancient practices which have very little to do with what most people understand as homosexuality today. Draws out the implicit heterosexism in other writings.
Casteli, Elizabeth. Review of Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism, Bernadette Brooten, Journal of Biblical Literature, 119(1): 127-129.
Cherry, Kitteredge, and Zalmon Sherwood, eds. Equal Rites: Lesbian And Gay Worship, Ceremonies, And Celebrations, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.
A collection of liturgy, worship materials, celebrations, and ceremonies designed particularly for people who identify as queer, as well as their pastors, family, and friends.
Clark, Michael. Defying the Darkness: A Gay Theology in the Shadows, Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim, 1997.
Cleaver, Richard. Know My Name: A Gay Liberation Theology, Louisville, KY
A book which deals with the struggles of queer-identified people (although primarily gays and lesbians) in the church in the context of liberation theology. Also deals with “gay” biblical hermeneutics.
Comstock, Gary David, Unrepentant, Self-Affirming, Practicing: Lesbian/Bisexual/Gay People within Organized Religion, New York, NY Continuum, 1996.
Comstock, Gary David and Susan E. Henking. Que(e)rying Religion: A Critical Anthology, New York, NY: Continuum, 1997.
A diverse array of essays that span multiple faiths, cultures, and ethnicities, that deal with both historical and contemporary non-dominant understandings or forms of sexuality in the context of religion.
Countryman, L. William.Dirt, Greed and Sex: Sexual Ethics in the New Testament and Their Implications for Today, Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1988.
Dover, Kenneth.Greek Homosexuality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978, 1989.
Dover’s research on Ancient Greek practices and patterns of male/male and/or (although much less so) female/female sexual interaction is still considered by many to be the preeminent work on the subject and is referenced in almost all works that deal with male/male sexual interaction in Ancient Greece.
Dreger, Alice Domurat.Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Edwards, George. “A Critique of Creationist Homophobia,” Journal of Homosexuality, 18 1989-1990: 95-118.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1978.
Fredrickson, David E. “Natural and Unnatural Use in Romans 1:24-27: Paul and the Philosophic Critique of Eros,” in Balch, David L., ed., Homosexuality, Sciences, and the “Plain Sense” of Scripture, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000: 197-222.
Furnish, Victor. “The Bible and Homosexuality: Reading the Texts in Context,” Homosexuality in the Church: Both Sides of the Debate, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1994: 18-35.
Essay that systematically deals with the parts of the Bible that have traditionally been used to condemn “homosexuality.” Notably, he puts quotes around “homosexuality” to indicate that such an institution did not exist during in biblical times.Some of his philological conclusions are incorrect and/or out of date, and the article tries to cover a lot in a small space. Overall, a very helpful introductory article in dealing with male/male and/or female/female sexuality as referred to in the Bible. Was written after Brooten’s Love Between Women, thus lacks updated information on women/women sexual intimacy in Early Christianity.
Glaser, Chris. Come Home! Reclaiming Spirituality and Community as Gay Men and Lesbians, San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1990.
A non-academic, affirming book that calls “gay men and lesbians” to come home to the church, which, the author argues should be accepting of gay men and lesbians.
Goldberg, Jonathan, ed. Reclaiming Sodom, New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge, 1994.
Good, Deirdre. “The New Testament and Homosexuality: Are We Getting Anywhere?” Religious Studies Review, 26(4), October 2000: 307-312
Goss, Robert. Jesus Acted Up: A Gay And Lesbian Manifesto, New York, NY: HarperCollins, 1993.
Develops a queer liberation theology, focusing on homophobia, queer hermeneutics, God as love-making and justice-doing.
Goss, Robert. Queering Christ: Beyond Jesus Acted Up, Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 2002.
Goss, Robert and Mona West, eds.Take Back the Word: A Queer Reading of the Bible, Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 2000.
Gudorf, Christine E.“The Bible and Science on Sexuality,” in Balch, David L., ed., Homosexuality, Sciences, and the “Plain Sense” of Scripture, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000: 121-141.
Halperin, David. One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York: Routledge, 1990
Hanson, K.C. “Blood and Purity in Leviticus and Revelation,” Listening: Journal of Religion and Culture, 28, 1993: 215-230.
Hays, Richard B. “Relations Natural and Unnatural: A Response to John Boswell’s Exegesis of Romans 1,” Journal of Religious Ethics, 14, 1986: 184-215.
Helminiak, Daniel A. What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality: Recent Findings by Top Scholars Offer a Radical New View, San Francisco, CA: Alamo Square Press, 1994.
Helminiak, Daniel A.“Response: Ethics, Biblical and Denominational: A Response to Mark Smith,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 65(4), 1997: 855-859.
Hunter, David. Review of Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism, Bernadette Brooten, Church History, 68(1): 138-139.
Jordan, Mark D.The Invention of Sodomy in Christian Theology, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Kiernan, Jas. “Responsibility in Sexual Perversion,” The Chicago Medical Recorder, 3, 1892.
Koch, Timothy, “Cruising as Methodology: Homoerotisim and the Scriptures,” in Stone, Ken, ed.,Queer Commentary and the Hebrew Bible, London, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001: 167-180.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, Eve.Epistemology of the Closet, Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1990.
Lienemann, Wolfgang. “Churches and Homosexuality,” Ecumenical Review 50(1), 2001: 7-21.
Loader, J.A. A Tale of Two Cities: Sodom and Gomorrah in the Old Testament, Early Jewish and Early Christian Traditions, Kampen, The Netherlands: Publishing House J.H. Kok, 1990.
Macourt, Malcolm, ed.Toward a Theology of Gay Liberation, London: SCM Press, 1977.
One of the earlier books on gay liberation theology. It is a collection of essays by men that emerged out of the Student Christian Movement, and at their conference with the same title as the book. The authors are all supportive of the gay liberation movement and seek to contribute to the question, “How should the church respond to two people of the same sex who are in love and feel as though they can better express that love together than apart?”
Martin, Dale. “Arsenokoités and Malakos: Meanings and Consequences,” in Brawley, Robert L., ed., Biblical Ethics & Homosexuality: Listening to Scripture, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1996: 117-136.
Martin, Dale. “Heterosexism and the Interpretation of Romans 1: 18-32,” Biblical Interpretation: A Journal of Contemporary Approaches, 3(3), October 1995: 332-355.
McFague, Sallie. The Body of God: An Ecological Theology, Minneapolis, MI: Fortress Press, 1993.
McNeill, John J. Freedom, Glorious Freedom: The Spiritual Journey to the Fullness of Life for Gays, Lesbians, and Everybody Else, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1995.
Miller, Neil. Out of the Past: Gay and Lesbian History from 1869 to the Present, New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1995.
Covers over 100 years of gay and lesbian history, with special sections on famous figures and important events.Easy to read; not overly academic.
Mollenkott, Virginia Ramey and Letha Scanzoni, Is The Homosexual My Neighbor? Another Christian View, San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1978.
Olyan, Saul M. “And with a Male You Shall Not Lie the Lying Down of a Woman,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 5, 1994: 179-206.
Schimel, Lawrence, and Carol Queen, eds. Pomosexuals: Challenging Assumptions About Gender and Sexuality. San Francisco, CA: Cleis Press, 1997.
A collection of essays written by those who argue that the hetero/homosexual model of sexuality is inadequate to describe the complex and rich ways in which humans can express sexuality. Essays by women who identify as gay men, transgendered and transsexual persons, as well as many other witty and challenging authors who challenge assumptions about gender and sexuality.
Schippert, Claudia. “Too Much Trouble? Negotiating Feminist and Queer Approaches in Religion,” Theology and Sexuality, 11 S 1999: 44-63.
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. In Memory of Her. A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins, New York, NY: Crossroad, 1983, 1994.
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth.Rhetoric and Ethic: The Politics of Biblical Studies, Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1999.
Scroggs, Robin.The New Testament and Homosexuality, Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1983.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky.Epistemology of the Closet, Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1990.
Smith, Abraham.“The New Testament and Homosexuality,” Quarterly Review 11.4, 1991: 18-32.
Stone, Ken, ed. Queer Commentary and the Hebrew Bible, London, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001.
A collection of essays that goes beyond historical-critical analysis of particular verses and ventures into attempts at reading the Hebrew Bible through a queer lens. Includes such essays as: “YHWH as Erastes” (Theodore W. Jennings, Jr), “Cruising as Methodology: Homoeroticism and the Scriptures,” (Timothy R. Koch) and “Violent Femmes and S/M: Queering Samson and Delilah” (Lori Rowlett).
Stuart, Elizabeth and Lisa Isherwood.Introducing Body Theology (Feminist Theology Series), Pilgrim Press, 2000.
Stuart, Elizabeth with Andy Braunston, Malcolm Edwards, John McMahon, and Tim Morrison. Religion is a Queer Thing: A Guide to the Christian Faith for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered People, London, UK: Cassell, 1997.
A book that can be used by a group of people who are dealing with queer issues within the context of Christianity. Although it is designed to be a book to walk the group through meetings and discussion, it is helpful in getting a basic handle on the queer liberation theology movement. Whereas some other books exclude bisexuals or transgender, this book is quite inclusive of both.
Thurston, Thomas M. “Leviticus 18:22 and the Prohibition of Homosexual Acts,” in ed. Stemmeler, Michael L. and Michael Clark, Homophobia and the Judeo-Christian Tradition Dallas, TX: Monument, 1990: 7-23.
Trible, Phyllis. God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality, Minneapolis, MI: Fortress Press, 1978.
Trible, Phyllis. Texts of Terror, London, 1984.
Walsh, Jerome. “Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13: Who Is Doing What to Whom?” Journal for Biblical Literature, 120.2, 2001: 201-209.
An analysis of Lev. 18:22 and 20:13 in light of Saul Olyan’s article in the Journal of the History of Sexuality in 1994. Walsh disputes Olyan’s claim that the first of the two laws is addressed to the active or penetrative partner, instead arguing that they are addressed to the passive partner. Makes clear that he understands 18:22 and 20:13 as purity-related laws, and not ethical ones.
Williams, Robert. Just As I Am: A Practical Guide to Being Out, Proud and Christian, New York, NY: HarperCollins, 1992.
Wilson, Nancy. Out Tribe: Queer Folks, God, Jesus, and the Bible, San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco, 1995.
White, Mel. Stranger at the Gate: To Be Gay and Christian in America, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1994.
An autobiography of Mel White, the director of Soulforce, a queer Christian liberation organization. Before falling in love with his partner, Ernest, White had previously worked for Billy Graham and Pat Robertson. He argues that “homosexual” orientation should be understood as a gift from God.
I have been meaning, every since the start of this blog, to start posting some of my bibliographies on here. Nothing is more helpful to me than to find a bibliography on a particular topic to get me started in a paper or some research. Needless to say that this would be helpful in my current work on purity in evangelical and fundamentalist churches. So the first one will be on queer theology. I’ll make it a separate post so it doesn’t have all this in it for anyone who finds it via a google search. Others will eventually include deliberative democracy, “Exporting” Democracy, ecofeminism and vegetarianism, feminist theology, and Gandhi and vegetarianism. Enjoy. Because I’m sure this is just what you’ve all be waiting for, right?